Question: In the following TIMEMAP, would you concur that square 2 has two t-junctions intersecting? And what is in square 3? Two future influences not converging, and yet connected?
Almine’s answer:
Yes, square 2 has two T junctions – there are two different issues that will be influenced by plans you are making about the future (goals you are setting for two different issues’ future outcomes). Furthermore because they seem to go all the way to (or near) the core, these are old very archetypal issues you need to gain clarity on.
Number three square is a very unusual configuration. This day you’ll be dealing with two ancient themes you’ve undertaken to understand. Issues around your overall destiny and purpose of your individuation. One is influenced by feminine emotions, and one by masculine emotions. (One comes from the left and the other from the right.)
Note: In studying the twelve pairs of pure emotions that Belvaspata practitioners work with, you will note that each pair has one masculine and one feminine emotion.
Even the distorted emotions have genders, such as fear (feminine), pain (feminine), anger (masculine) and protectiveness (masculine). Guilt is neutral and can be expressed in either a masculine or feminine way.
Regarding square #19, It seems the primary significance is that of a ninety-degree angle turning left, i.e. an emotional direction change required. Ninety-degree angles, according to Almine, mean an attitude or perception needs to change. If its to the left – attitude or emotion. If its to the right, perception – the way we value something for instance. All angles in the picture below turn right, except square 39 which goes left.
Thank you Rogier!
Yes, this is very clear. Thank you!
please can someone tell me if you have to look from the core to the rim of from the rim to the core to know if a horizontal line comes from the right side or the left side
must we stand in de centre of the circle so to speak
of at the rim and look to the centre
iam grateful for the answer
Yes, you determine the direction by adopting the vantage point of looking outward from the center. This is how you gauge the direction a ninety-degree angle is turning, and the direction from which a horizontal t-junction is coming.
However, if the line is coming from the future, you look from that vantage point. So for today, in the above map box 19, it is an influence from the future, that is going right. So a perception needs to change. Is this accurate?
thank you Rogier – great clarity, and re Manjari’s comment re lines in Day/Box 19 – would you agree there too?? (on the proviso that one was sure the line came ‘from’ the rim?)
Thank you so much for this clarification. I am finding the Timemaps to be so powerful. In eternal LPGT.